This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Church, A. H. Articles by Van Eynde, D. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Values, Motives, and Interventions of Organization Development Practitioners

W. Warner Burke Associates, Inc.

W. Warner Burke

Teachers College, Columbia University

Donald F. Van Eynde

Trinity University

A mail survey was conducted to empirically measure respondents' perceptions of the values, motives, and interventions of today's organization development (OD) practitioners. The survey sample consisted of 1,500 names randomly selected from three different professional organizations. Overall, 416 practitioners (27.7%) returned the questionnaire. Data from each of the three content areas were analyzed through: (a) factor analyses to determine the underlying structure and to generate subscales, and (b) MANCOVAs to assess the degree of differences among various types of respondents (e.g., professional association membership, gender, internal vs. external status) across the respective summary scores. In terms of the values of OD, results indicated that practitioners perceive the field today to be focused more on business effectiveness and productivity issues than on the humanistic concerns and orientation of the past. Although respondents rated interest in social action and helping people as the most important motivators of OD work in the ideal, exercising personal power and reaping the rewards of the consulting relationship were considered to be the more dominant motivators for people in the field today. Regarding interventions, practitioners reported engaging primarily in activities aimed at long-term organizational change, action research methodologies, and management skills training.

Group & Organization Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, 5-50 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1059601194191002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Fagenson-Eland, E. A. Ensher, and W. W. Burke Organization Development and Change Interventions: A Seven-Nation Comparison Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2004; 40(4): 432 - 464. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. G. Worley and A. E. Feyerherm Reflections on the Future of Organization Development Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2003; 39(1): 97 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. H. Church, M. Gilbert, D. H. Oliver, K. Paquet, and C. Surface The Role of Technology in Organization Development and Change Advances in Developing Human Resources, November 1, 2002; 4(4): 493 - 511. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. H. Church, J. Waclawski, and W. W. Burke OD Practitioners as Facilitators of Change: An Analysis of Survey Results Group Organization Management, March 1, 1996; 21(1): 22 - 66. [Abstract]