Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Group & Organization Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tata, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Influence of Gender on the Use and Effectiveness of Managerial Accounts

Jasmine Tata

Loyola University

This study empirically examined a model of the relationships between managerial accounts (explanations), gender of manager, gender of employee, and evaluation of the manager. Results indicated that female managers seemed to use mitigating accounts (that minimize rats to employees' self-esteem) more than male managers, but there were no gender differences in the use of aggravating accounts (that increase heats to employees' self-esteem). Gender of employee also influenced the type of account; female employees reported more mitigating accounts and male employees more aggravating accounts. In addition, male who provided aggravating accounts were evaluated more favorably than female managers using such accounts; there was no difference, however, in evaluations of male and female managers providing mitigating accounts.

Group & Organization Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, 267-288 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/1059601198233005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?