Group & Organization Management

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houghton, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group & Organization Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, 325-353 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1059601100254002
© 2000 SAGE Publications

No Safety in Numbers

Persistence of Biases and Their Effects on Team Risk Perception and Team Decision Making

Susan M. Houghton

Georgia State University

Mark Simon

Oakland University

Karl Aquino

University of Delaware

Caren B. Goldberg

George Washington University

Because individuals can have cognitive biases that lower their perceptions of decision risk, some suggest that teams, not individuals, should make decisions. Prior research, however, has not explored whether a team’s risk perception is affected by information-processing biases that are similar to the cognitive biases that individuals exhibit. This study examines whether three biases—the law of small numbers bias, illusion of control, and overconfidence—influence perception of risk of a first move at the team and individual levels. It was found that the law of small numbers and illusion of control decreased the risk perception at both levels and that the law of small numbers had a significantly greater effect on team risk perception than on individual risk perception. In contrast, the effect of overconfidence was not significant at any level. Implications of the findings are discussed and future research directions are offered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
D. Tjosvold and Ziyou Yu
Group Risk Taking: The Constructive Role of Controversy in China
Group Organization Management, December 1, 2007; 32(6): 653 - 674.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
D. Tjosvold, M. M. L. Tang, and M. West
Reflexivity for Team Innovation in China: The Contribution of Goal Interdependence
Group Organization Management, October 1, 2004; 29(5): 540 - 559.
[Abstract] [PDF]