|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Typology of Virtual Teams
Implications for Effective Leadership
Bradford S. Bell
Steve W. J. Kozlowski
Michigan State University
As the nature of work in todays organizations becomes more complex, dynamic, and global, there has been increasing emphasis on distributed, "virtual" teams as organizing units of work. Despite their growing prevalence, relatively little is known about this new form of work unit. The purpose of this article is to present a theoretical framework to focus research toward understanding virtual teams and identifying implications for effective leadership. The authors focus on delineating the dimensions of a typology to characterize different types of virtual teams. First, the authors distinguish virtual teams from conventional teams to identify where current knowledge applies and new research needs exist. Second, the authors distinguish among different types of virtual teams, considering the critical role of task complexity in determining the underlying characteristics of virtual teams and leadership challenges the different types entail. Propositions addressing leadership implications for the effective management of virtual teams are proposed and discussed.
Group & Organization Management, Vol. 27, No. 1,
14-49 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1059601102027001003

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Whitford and S. A. Moss
Transformational Leadership in Distributed Work Groups: The Moderating Role of Follower Regulatory Focus and Goal Orientation
Communication Research,
December 1, 2009;
36(6):
810 - 837.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Peters and R. J. Karren
An Examination of the Roles of Trust and Functional Diversity on Virtual Team Performance Ratings
Group Organization Management,
August 1, 2009;
34(4):
479 - 504.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Gibbs
Dialectics in a global software team: Negotiating tensions across time, space, and culture
Human Relations,
June 1, 2009;
62(6):
905 - 935.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Carmeli and Z. Sheaffer
How Learning Leadership and Organizational Learning from Failures Enhance Perceived Organizational Capacity to Adapt to the Task Environment
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 2008;
44(4):
468 - 489.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Cramton, K. L. Orvis, and J. M. Wilson
Situation Invisibility and Attribution in Distributed Collaborations
Journal of Management,
August 1, 2007;
33(4):
525 - 546.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bosch-Sijtsema
The Impact of Individual Expectations and Expectation Conflicts on Virtual Teams
Group Organization Management,
June 1, 2007;
32(3):
358 - 388.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Connaughton and M. Shuffler
Multinational and Multicultural Distributed Teams: A Review and Future Agenda
Small Group Research,
June 1, 2007;
38(3):
387 - 412.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Saunders and M. K. Ahuja
Are All Distributed Teams the Same? Differentiating Between Temporary and Ongoing Distributed Teams
Small Group Research,
December 1, 2006;
37(6):
662 - 700.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. Kirkman and J. E. Mathieu
The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality
Journal of Management,
October 1, 2005;
31(5):
700 - 718.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|