Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Group & Organization Management
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lui, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ngo, H.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Influence of Structural and Process Factors on Partnership Satisfaction in Interfirm Cooperation

Steven S. Lui

City University of Hong Kong

Hang-Yue Ngo

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

In this study, the authors investigate the relationship of structure and process with partnership satisfaction in interfirm cooperation. In particular, they focus on the less-researched aspect of process. Structure refers to the ex-ante transaction cost-based and partner characteristics of the partnership, whereas process refers to the action pattern that unfolds during the cooperation. Two structural factors, asset specificity and partner reputation, are first examined. Informed by an action approach, they further identify three important aspects of the cooperation process, namely, action acquiescence, action simplicity, and action reciprocity. Their relationships with partnership satisfaction are tested on a sample of 230 architect-contractor partnerships in Hong Kong. The results revealed that action acquiescence and action simplicity explained significant variance in partnership satisfaction above and beyond those explained by the two structural factors.

Key Words: cooperation process • partner interaction • action pattern • alliance outcomes

Group & Organization Management, Vol. 30, No. 4, 378-397 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1059601103259113


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
J. Wincent
An Exchange Approach on Firm Cooperative Orientation and Outcomes of Strategic Multilateral Network Participants
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2008; 33(3): 303 - 329.
[Abstract] [PDF]