|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Helping Behavior in Work Groups
A Multilevel Analysis
K. Yee Ng
Nanyang Technological University
Linn Van Dyne
Michigan State University, vandyne{at}msu.edu
Our study examines two models of helping behavior in work groups. Our first model is a cross-level model and predicts that group-level cohesion, cooperative norms, and task conflict are related to individual helping behavior (peer-rated). Results support our hypotheses and further demonstrate that of the three group characteristics, cooperative norms have the strongest relationship with individual helping behavior. Our second model is a group-level model and examines the relationships among configural conceptualizations of group-level helping and group performance in conjunctive tasks. Results demonstrate that the least and the most helpful members in the group influence group performance in interesting ways. We conclude by discussing implications of our findings for practice and future research.
Key Words: helping multilevel group characteristics performance
Group & Organization Management, Vol. 30, No. 5,
514-540 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1059601104269107

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Oosterhof, G. S. Van der Vegt, E. Van de Vliert, and K. Sanders
Valuing Skill Differences: Perceived Skill Complementarity and Dyadic Helping Behavior in Teams
Group Organization Management,
October 1, 2009;
34(5):
536 - 562.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Nielsen, G. A. Hrivnak, and M. Shaw
Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Group-Level Research
Small Group Research,
October 1, 2009;
40(5):
555 - 577.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. C. Botero and L. Van Dyne
Employee Voice Behavior: Interactive Effects of LMX and Power Distance in the United States and Colombia
Management Communication Quarterly,
August 1, 2009;
23(1):
84 - 104.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Chiocchio and H. Essiembre
Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams
Small Group Research,
August 1, 2009;
40(4):
382 - 420.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sonnentag and J. Volmer
Individual-Level Predictors of Task-Related Teamwork Processes: The Role of Expertise and Self-Efficacy in Team Meetings
Group Organization Management,
February 1, 2009;
34(1):
37 - 66.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Love and M. Forret
Exchange Relationships at Work: An Examination of the Relationship Between Team-Member Exchange and Supervisor Reports of Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies,
May 1, 2008;
14(4):
342 - 352.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Neubert, S. Taggar, and S. Cady
The role of conscientiousness and extraversion in affecting the relationship between perceptions of group potency and volunteer group member selling behavior: An interactionist perspective
Human Relations,
September 1, 2006;
59(9):
1235 - 1260.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|